Security Assurance · GRC · Secure AutomationRemote delivery for growing technology businesses
Managed GRC

Keep the security programme operating between audits.

Managed GRC turns risk, evidence, access, suppliers, policies and corrective actions into an operating cadence instead of an annual scramble.

Recurring governance without a large internal GRC team.

The service is structured around the client's risk profile, certification commitments and customer assurance workload.

Risk & Exception Management

Maintain risk treatment, exceptions, residual risk and review dates.

Evidence & Control Reviews

Maintain evidence calendars, test recurring controls and track operating gaps.

Access & Supplier Oversight

Coordinate periodic access, privileged access and supplier-risk review cycles.

Policy & Governance Calendar

Review policies, responsibilities, metrics, management-review inputs and governance actions.

Corrective Action

Track findings, due dates, evidence of remediation, retesting and closure.

Audit & Questionnaire Readiness

Prepare surveillance evidence and respond more efficiently to customer security questionnaires.

Example cadence.

The exact cadence is risk-based; it should not be reduced to a generic monthly checklist.

CadenceTypical activitiesOutputs
MonthlyRisk and exception changes, corrective actions, evidence due, security incidentsStatus pack and action tracker
QuarterlyAccess reviews, supplier/control reviews, metrics and leadership reportingReview evidence and management metrics
Annual / plannedInternal audit planning, management review, policy review, certification preparationAudit records, management decisions and readiness pack
On changeMajor system, supplier, business or scope changesRisk update and control impact assessment

Managed GRC should produce decisions, not just reminders.

The point is to maintain control ownership and evidence quality, identify failures early, and give management a defensible view of risk.

A useful GRC programme can answer: what changed, what failed, what evidence proves the control, who owns the remediation, and what residual risk remains?